Poker player

Geozoh Netanelof

United States

Geozoh Netanelof is an American poker player who made a notable deep run in the 2014 Parx Big Stax VI tournament. He reached the final 18 players with a 900,000 chip stack before being eliminated. His career is primarily defined by this single live event cash.

Career earnings: $ 68,468

Early Career

Geozoh Netanelof first appeared in live tournament records at the Parx Casino in Bensalem, Pennsylvania, during the Big Stax VI series in May 2014. No earlier tournament results are publicly available.

Parx Big Stax VI Deep Run

In the main event of Parx Big Stax VI, Netanelof advanced to the final two tables. At the final break of Level 23 (blinds 12,000/24,000/4,000), he was seated at Table 47 with 900,000 chips. The tournament had 18 players remaining at that point, each guaranteed a cash prize of at least $2,589. Netanelof eventually fell short of the final table (top 9), but his finish placed him among the top 1% of the field.

Chip Stack Analysis

During the final break, Netanelof's 900,000 chips represented approximately 60 big blinds (with blinds at 15,000/30,000/5,000 ante for the upcoming level). This placed him slightly below the average stack of 1,500,000, indicating he was in the middle of the pack but still had room to maneuver. His table included several notable players such as John Dascoli (2,400,000) and Trevor Deeter (3,100,000).

Financial Summary

Based on the payout structure, Netanelof's cash in Parx Big Stax VI was likely between $2,589 (for 19th–24th) and $4,000 (estimated for 18th). This represents his only recorded tournament cash to date.

Context and Legacy

Netanelof's performance at Parx Big Stax VI places him within the competitive regional poker scene of the mid-2010s. While he did not achieve widespread recognition, his deep run demonstrates the skill required to navigate large-field tournaments. No further appearances have been documented, suggesting he may have transitioned away from poker or remained an amateur enthusiast.

Comments (0)

|

Sign in to join the discussion

Related