You Are Bluffing Too Much: Hand Analysis and Adjustment Strategy
7 views
This article analyzes a hand to demonstrate how to correctly select bluffing hands on the river. Using the difference between GTO and actual player ranges, it explains why some seemingly reasonable bluffs may be profit-losing in real gameplay.
Hand Review
The UTG player raises to 400, and Ben calls from the big blind with A♠ T♠ (effective stack 23,000). The pot is 2,440. The flop comes 2♥ K♣ 3♠. UTG bets 595 (about 1/4 pot), and Ben calls.
This is a profitable defense. Facing a quarter-pot continuation bet from UTG, the decision is not difficult. We have an overcard and a backdoor flush draw. Even if currently behind, we beat all of UTG's bluffing combos.
The turn is Q♠ (pot 3,630). UTG bets 2,678, and Ben calls.
UTG will continue betting with many bluff combos like A4, A5, JT, T9, etc., so our hand is still strong enough to call. If we held a weaker flush draw, raising or folding might be better, but here we have enough equity to call. Any A, J, or spade gives us very strong hands, and currently we are ahead of most of UTG's bluffs.
The river is 8♣ (pot 8,986). UTG bets 6,695 (leaving 13,042), action on Ben.
Ben's flush draw missed, leaving only Ace-high. Facing UTG's large river bet. In this situation, first consider where your hand falls in your range.
We need to value-jam with our best hands, so we also need some bluffs. The question is whether A♠ T♠ is one of the hands we want to bluff-jam or if it's better to fold.
UTG's GTO River Betting Range
To figure this out, let's see what GTO suggests we do. The image below shows UTG's GTO river range (orange = raise, green = call, blue = fold).

You can see GTO wants UTG to bet quite aggressively, even with this large 3/4-pot size. According to GTO, they should value bet K9+ (top pair medium kicker) and include many missed draws and Ax combos as bluffs.
In reality, low-stakes players almost always under-bluff on the river, and they likely won't value bet as thinly as GTO suggests.
UTG's Adjusted Range
Therefore, we adjust UTG's river range to be more realistic:
Here we change UTG's river range so that K9 and KT are completely checked, but we still keep some bluff combos like Ax, T9, 76, and 54.
Many players, even with strong hands like AK, will check back conservatively after Ben calls the flop and turn. But this range better represents typical low-stakes player behavior. Let's see GTO's response to this adjusted range.
Ben's GTO Response to UTG's Bet
The image below shows Ben's GTO defense range facing UTG's river bet (orange = raise, green = call, blue = fold).
Conclusion and Adjustment
The GTO model suggests bluff-jamming with A♠ T♠, but only if the opponent's range is GTO-perfectly balanced. In actual low-stakes games, opponents under-bluff, which lowers the EV of calling or jamming.
A better strategy: fold A♠ T♠, because the opponent's actual range is more value-heavy, and we almost never have the winning hand. Meanwhile, we can use more disguised bluff combos (like those with blockers) to exploit the opponent's tendencies.
In summary, don't blindly follow GTO; adjust your bluffing frequency based on the opponent's actual tendencies.