Poker player

Rod Brown

Editor: dezhoupuke.org

United States

Rod Brown is an American professional poker player known for his deep run in the 2011 World Series of Poker, finishing runner-up in Event #39: $2,500 Pot-Limit Hold'em/Omaha for $191,618. He also cashed in WSOP events in 1996 and 2005, showcasing his longevity in the game.

Career earnings: $ 57,113

Early WSOP Cashes

Rod Brown first appeared on the World Series of Poker (WSOP) radar in 1996, cashing in Event #5: $1,500 Limit Seven Card Stud Hi-Lo. He finished 8th out of 245 entrants, earning $7,350. Nine years later, in March 2005, he returned to the WSOP and placed 5th in Event #2: $1,000 Limit Hold'em, taking home $7,945. These results established him as a consistent contender in limit poker events.

2011 WSOP [Runner](/term/runner)-Up Finish

Brown's most notable achievement came at the 2011 WSOP in Event #39: $2,500 Pot-Limit Hold'em/Omaha. After battling through a field of 606 players, he reached heads-up play against Mitch Schock. On the final hand, Brown held top pair with a straight draw on a flop of 2♠5♣J♥, while Schock held A♠A♦ with the nut flush draw. Brown committed all his chips and Schock made the nut flush on the turn, leaving Brown as the runner-up. He earned $191,618 for his second-place finish.

Playing Style

Based on his 2011 final table performance, Brown demonstrates an aggressive, calculated style. In the decisive hand, he raised from the button and called a three-bet, then repotted all-in on the flop with top pair and a straight draw. This willingness to apply pressure with drawing hands reflects his understanding of pot odds and opponent tendencies. His earlier cash results in limit poker also suggest versatility across different formats.

Legacy

Although Brown has not won a WSOP bracelet, his runner-up finish and two additional WSOP cashes demonstrate his skill and endurance in competitive poker. He remains a respected figure among peers, known for his disciplined approach and ability to perform under pressure.

Comments (0)

|

Sign in to join the discussion

Related